Rocco Cozza • August 2, 2024

Pennsylvania enacts new law related to healthcare provider non-compete agreement

Understanding Pennsylvania's New Law on Non-Compete Agreements for Healthcare Workers


Pennsylvania has made a significant change to how non-compete agreements work for healthcare professionals. On July 23, 2024, Governor Josh Shapiro signed the Fair Contracting for Health Care Practitioners Act. This new law impacts non-compete agreements between healthcare practitioners and their employers, focusing on those agreements that last longer than a year or when a healthcare practitioner is dismissed by their employer. The law is set to take effect on January 1, 2025.


Key Points of the New Law


The new law makes certain non-compete agreements void and unenforceable. Specifically, it targets agreements that prevent healthcare practitioners from continuing to treat or accept new patients after leaving an employer. However, there’s an important exception: if the non-compete agreement is less than a year long and the healthcare practitioner leaves voluntarily (i.e., is not dismissed), it can still be enforced.


Here’s a breakdown of what this means:


- Who is Affected? The law applies to a wide range of healthcare workers, including medical doctors, osteopaths, certified registered nurse anesthetists, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. Essentially, if you’re a healthcare provider working at a healthcare facility or office, this law could apply to you.


- What's Covered? The law uses the term “non-compete covenants,” but it broadly includes what we usually think of as patient non-solicitation agreements. If an agreement makes it difficult for a healthcare worker to treat patients or accept new ones, it’s likely covered under this law.


- Exceptions and Limitations:  Non-compete agreements that last no more than a year and apply to voluntarily separated employees remain valid. Additionally, the law doesn’t restrict employers from reclaiming reasonable expenses for things like relocation, training, and setting up a patient base, as long as these expenses accrued in the three years before the healthcare worker left and were amortized over a period of up to five years after their departure.


Additional Provisions


There are a couple more points worth noting:


1. Sale of Business Interests: The law doesn’t affect non-compete agreements related to the sale of a healthcare practitioner's ownership stake in a business or the sale, transfer, or change of control of the business.


2. Patient Notification Requirements: If a healthcare practitioner had an ongoing relationship with a patient for two or more years and saw the patient within a year before leaving, the employer must notify the patient within 90 days of the practitioner's departure. The notice must inform the patient about the practitioner's departure, offer the option to continue care with them, and provide information on how to transfer records if needed.


 What Employers Should Do Next


If you’re an entity employing healthcare practitioners in Pennsylvania, it’s crucial to consult with our team to review your existing contracts. You should evaluate any post-employment restrictions and establish a plan for the patient notification process.   Please feel free reach out to schedule a consultation with our team.


Cozza Law Group Business Law Blog

By Matthew Bolewitz April 20, 2026
the 5 d's of business - a must read for business owners
By Rocco Cozza April 19, 2026
How Business Litigation Protects Companies From Costly Disputes Although there are many costs involved in doing business, disputes can take a particularly high toll on a company's finances. These disputes might involve contract breaches, copyright violations, premises liability lawsuits, allegations of fraud, and much more. The obvious strategy is to avoid these disputes at all costs. How does business litigation fit into this equation? Can a company use business litigation to strategically protect itself from disputes? These are questions you might want to explore with an experienced business litigation lawyer in Pittsburgh . Business Litigation Strategies Are Often Preventive in Nature Many business litigation strategies are preventative in nature. In other words, companies take effective, early legal steps to eliminate the chances of disputes and legal action at a later date. One example of this is an effective business contract. When drafted properly, a business contract leaves little room for litigation or any other disputes. Many contracts contain arbitration or mediation clauses. These clauses force parties toward private negotiations instead of the courtroom floor. This private “alternative dispute resolution” (ADR) process is inherently cheaper, faster, and more private than litigation. Once a dispute reaches the courtroom, companies must pay much higher legal fees. They also face longer timelines. One of the biggest downsides of litigation for companies is its public nature. Many companies desperately need to keep sensitive information out of the public eye, whether that includes baseless allegations, copyrighted material, trade secrets, or more. Private negotiations can be so quick that they can hardly be called “disputes,” and issues may be resolved in a matter of weeks. In an ideal world, these disputes never even happen in the first place. A strong contract lays out clear responsibilities and privileges for each party, leaving little room for misinterpretation. Another obvious way to avoid business litigation is by choosing appropriate business partners. Another preventative business litigation strategy involves liability waivers. Although these waivers are not as effective as some company leaders assume, they can nonetheless prevent many needless or frivolous lawsuits. Liability waivers are not appropriate or possible in all industries, but they could be worth considering for businesses that welcome large numbers of patrons onto their premises. Business Litigation Strategies May Involve Regulatory Compliance Sometimes, the biggest legal threat to a business is not a partner or a customer, but rather the government. Regulatory compliance is an incredibly important business litigation strategy, and company leaders should consider consulting with lawyers who understand the specific regulations and laws that pertain to their industries. For example, a company that deals with industrial waste or chemicals may need to become highly familiar with the environmental laws. Generally speaking, these laws become more restrictive each year. Company leaders may need to keep a close eye on regulatory changes to ensure compliance. A company in another industry might deal with a substantial number of employees. If this is the case, the company might need to pay close attention to labor laws, discrimination laws, religious rights, and many other factors that can lead to employment lawsuits. Poaching is another issue that could be concerning, as are non-compete clauses. An experienced business litigation law firm may be able to help companies draft policies and contracts that drastically limit the number of employment-based legal issues in the future. For example, a company might have to follow strict guidelines if it wants to create enforceable non-compete clauses in Pennsylvania. Organized Corporate Governance Can Reduce Litigation and Disputes Many business disputes stem from poor, disorganized corporate governance. When the working relationship between shareholders, partners, and the executive suite begins to fall apart, disputes are inevitable. Effective shareholder agreements and organized record-keeping can go a long way in making sure everyone is on the same page. Business Litigation Attorneys Can Help With Risk Assessment Sometimes, dispute prevention starts with risk assessment. If company leaders become aware of a potential legal risk, they might consider a different approach or business strategy. For example, a company might consider entering into a new contract with a supplier. A business litigation attorney may be able to conduct effective legal research into the new supplier to determine the legal risk associated with a new contract. Perhaps the new supplier tends to get into lawsuits with its partners. Maybe the company is already in the process of being sued. Whatever the case may be, an experienced lawyer can help company leaders assess the legal risks associated with certain actions before moving forward. Most Disputes Never Reach the Trial Stage Since parties usually understand the downsides of going to trial, they tend to settle their disputes outside of court. This means that disputes rarely escalate into trials. However, this does not necessarily mean that a privately settled dispute is not costly for a company. Instead, a settlement could be disastrous for a company. This is why it makes sense to negotiate effectively, even if you’re dealing with someone who agrees to mediation or arbitration. Business litigation attorneys are often effective negotiators, and they can guide both parties toward mutually beneficial outcomes. If the goal is to reduce the cost of a dispute, a lawyer can push back with effective counterpoints and counteroffers. If the goal is to gain as large a settlement as possible, your lawyer can advocate on your behalf and reject lowball offers. Can a Business Litigation Lawyer in Pittsburgh Help My Company? Whether you are facing a dispute or you simply want to avoid the possibility of legal action in the future, a business litigation lawyer in Pittsburgh may be able to help. These lawyers can help your company take preventative steps, such as creating effective contracts or liability waivers. A business litigation attorney can also help you if your company is already facing a serious dispute or lawsuit. Consider reaching out to Cozza Law Group, PLLC, at (412) 790-2789 to learn more about your next potential steps. You can also find us online .