BLOG ARTICLES

Shareholders set corporations apart from other types of businesses, and they often help companies achieve considerable levels of success. On the other hand, executives and directors often forget that each shareholder is a part owner. With so many owners, it is easy to see how complex shareholder disputes can become. The first step is to understand why and how these shareholder disputes arise. The second step is to resolve the dispute, potentially with guidance from an experienced business litigation attorney in Pennsylvania . Shareholder Disputes Arise Because of Shareholder Rights To understand shareholder disputes, you first have to understand shareholder rights. Common shareholders have voting privileges, which means they can control the trajectory of the company. Although some shareholders never bother to vote, others take these rights very seriously. The more shares you have, the more power you have to control major decisions. Shareholders also have the right to profit from the success of a company. Because of this, they have a financial incentive to oversee the company’s trajectory. If the company leadership starts to make mistakes or intentionally act against the interests of the shareholders, disputes naturally arise. Finally, shareholders rely on the accuracy of records and corporate books to make their investment decisions. For example, they might choose to sell or hold their stocks depending on the published earnings of a company. If these records are inaccurate or intentionally altered, the shareholders may make poor investment choices as a result. Now that you understand shareholder rights, it is easy to see how shareholder disputes might arise. Shareholders might sue if they feel that the company is making major decisions without bothering to hold votes. They might also sue if they feel that the leadership is acting against their best interests. Another type of lawsuit might involve shareholders suing a company for inflating their earnings and releasing inaccurate data. Shareholder Disputes Often Begin With Alternative Dispute Resolution Most lawsuits, including shareholder disputes, go through a process of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) before parties actually proceed to the courtroom. ADR may involve mediation or arbitration, and it takes the form of private negotiations. The shareholders may select legal counsel to negotiate on their behalf, as it would be impractical for thousands of individuals to sit at the negotiation table. In other situations, an individual shareholder might file a lawsuit on their own. In this situation, that individual might be present at the negotiation table alongside their legal counsel. ADR often serves everyone’s best interests, helping to resolve disputes without resorting to expensive and time-consuming litigation. Public trials are not good for business, and shareholders might be just as willing to resolve these issues in private as the executive suite. Arbitration clauses are often “built in” to the corporate bylaws or charter. In other words, parties may have no choice but to attempt mediation/arbitration before proceeding to a trial. That said, parties are under no obligation to successfully complete the arbitration process. One party could refuse to negotiate, and a trial would subsequently become inevitable. What are Some Common Types of Shareholder Disputes? Shareholder disputes may take various forms. All of these lawsuits fall into four main categories, however. An individual shareholder might file a direct lawsuit against the company. Another type of lawsuit might be a “derivative suit,” which involves the shareholders suing on behalf of the corporation. This type of lawsuit often targets a specific bad actor within the company, such as a self-dealing CEO. Class actions are also relatively common. In this type of lawsuit, numerous shareholders join forces to file a single lawsuit against the corporation, often under federal securities law. Finally, a dispute might take the form of an “appraisal proceeding,” which focuses on whether the company has received a fair valuation before a merger. How Does Pennsylvania Law Affect Shareholder Disputes? Pennsylvania law is quite deferential to the board of directors, granting it considerable control and authority. A common source of conflict in a corporation is the contrast between the “democracy” of the shareholders and the authority of the board of directors. Pennsylvania tilts the scales in favor of the board. First, Pennsylvania requires a shareholder to make a written demand to the board before they can file a derivative lawsuit. The board can then appoint a “Special Litigation Committee” to investigate the shareholders' claims and demands. If the committee determines that a lawsuit would go against the best interests of the company, courts in Pennsylvania may not allow it to continue. It is difficult to circumvent these requirements for derivative lawsuits in the Keystone State because of strict limits on direct lawsuits. Finally, Pennsylvania has no rule that states a board must place its shareholders’ interests above those of other relevant parties. These parties might include employees, customers, suppliers, and even the greater community or environment. This is not the same in other jurisdictions, making the Keystone State a “board-friendly” state that repels takeovers. In fact, it is considered by many to be the most management-friendly state in the country and one of the toughest places for shareholder plaintiffs to sue. While this is good news for boards facing shareholder lawsuits, the Keystone State’s protections are not infinite. Effective legal representation is necessary to take advantage of the jurisdiction’s legal safeguards. On the other hand, plaintiff shareholders can still achieve success in Pennsylvania, but they may need to rely on innovative, experienced business litigation lawyers in the face of strong regulatory barriers. Contact Cozza Law Group PLLC to Learn More About Shareholder Disputes While online research can provide plenty of insights into shareholder disputes, each case is slightly different. Given the varied nature of shareholder disputes, it may help to discuss your specific circumstances with a business litigation attorney in Pennsylvania . Cozza Law Group PLLC serves enterprises of all sizes, offering a fractional counsel model that provides legal guidance that fits your company’s unique needs. Continue this dialogue by contacting us at 412-453-8673 or visiting us online .

Business owners in Pennsylvania depend on clear contracts to formalize relationships and enforce obligations. When a business partner breaches a contract, the next steps may seem unclear. Perhaps you assumed that with a clear contract in place, your partner would never dare violate it. So what happens now? What kinds of penalties might your business partner face? Will you both have to go to court? How can you limit the cost of this contractual dispute and maintain your profit margins? These are all questions worth raising during a consultation with a contract lawyer in Pittsburgh . Review Your Contract to Determine the Next Steps The fact that you already have a contract in place is encouraging. This means that at the very least, your business partner will face certain consequences for breaching the contract. That said, the nature of these consequences depends entirely on your unique contract, and some are less effective than others in holding parties accountable for breaches. Perhaps the most obvious step is to confirm whether your contract has an arbitration or mediation clause. If a clause of this nature exists, you must go through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) before proceeding to a trial. If you are not familiar with the ADR process, you should know that resolving a dispute in private is generally preferable to litigation (trials). From a business perspective, private negotiations cost less. They are also faster, allowing everyone to focus fully on running their respective businesses sooner rather than later. Finally, the confidential nature of these discussions may help protect trade secrets, intellectual property, and other details that could be embarrassing or harmful for businesses. Many people feel that ADR is less stressful than trials. You should also check your existing contract for clauses that outline penalties for breaches. These penalties are often financial in nature, and they can dissuade business partners from violating their contracts. Sometimes, simply reminding business partners of these financial penalties is enough to encourage them to adhere to their contractual obligations. You can discuss potential penalties and outcomes with your business partner without involving a lawyer. This is often referred to as “informal resolution,” and it occurs before the ADR process begins. That being said, you may want to inform your lawyer of any plans you might have for resolving the dispute. If you are not careful, you could violate laws and regulations while negotiating in an informal manner. For example, you could inadvertently violate laws against extortion as you attempt to pressure your business partner into fulfilling the contractual obligation. Pennsylvania also has specific debt collection laws that prevent you from contacting debtors in certain ways or at certain times. Evidence Is Important During a Contract Breach Although you may not need to go to court to resolve the contract breach, it makes sense to begin collecting evidence as soon as possible. You should also be aware that your business partner is probably collecting evidence of their own at the same time. Be extremely careful about how you communicate with your business partner during this time, especially in emails, letters, and text messages. All of these written communications could become relevant in a later trial. Assume that your business partner is taking screenshots of your texts, saving your emails, and making copies of everything. If you’re concerned about saying something that could be problematic during a later trial, consider allowing your business litigation attorney to communicate on your behalf. The type of evidence necessary for a breach of contract lawsuit depends on the type of breach involved. If the breach involves a business partner, you may be facing issues like misappropriated funds, confidentiality breaches, leadership disputes, and failures to contribute equally to the business. In the event of misappropriated funds, financial records may be particularly important. If possible, make copies of bank statements and all other relevant financial documents as soon as you notice the misappropriation. If your business partner refuses to provide certain financial documents to you, rest assured that your lawyer can help you gain access through a pre-trial process called “discovery.” The court can compel your business partner to hand over the documents if they refuse to comply. If you are dealing with a confidentiality breach, you can also gain access to key communications through the discovery process. For example, your business partner might have shared trade secrets or intellectual property with an unauthorized third party through email. You can compel your business partner to hand over these emails, giving you the evidence you need to prove the breach. Perhaps your business partner started making important decisions about the business without your input. Maybe you feel sidelined, and you believe that your business partner is trying to take over the business while forcing you out. In this situation, you need to find evidence that your business partner started making key decisions without your input. If a majority vote was necessary, find evidence that this voting process never occurred. If you believe that your business partner is not doing their fair share of work, you should compile evidence that shows you are doing most or all of the “heavy lifting” when it comes to daily operations. Perhaps you believe that your business partner is profiting from your hard work while doing almost nothing to help the business grow. If your contract states that all partners should make a good-faith effort to contribute, this could constitute a legitimate contract breach. Can a Business Contract Lawyer in Pittsburgh Help Me? A business contract lawyer in Pittsburgh may be able to help if your partner recently breached your contract. While online research may help you understand what happens next, each contract is unique. Because of the varying nature of these contracts, it makes sense to discuss your specific circumstances with a legal professional. Cozza Law Group PLLC has consistently earned mentions in lists like “Pennsylvania Super Lawyers” and “Law Firm 500.” Our attorneys have experience in many different industries, and we have helped companies handle numerous contractual disputes. Contact Cozza Law Group PLLC at 412-453-8673 today to get started. You can also find us online .

the 5 d's of business - a must read for business owners

How Business Litigation Protects Companies From Costly Disputes Although there are many costs involved in doing business, disputes can take a particularly high toll on a company's finances. These disputes might involve contract breaches, copyright violations, premises liability lawsuits, allegations of fraud, and much more. The obvious strategy is to avoid these disputes at all costs. How does business litigation fit into this equation? Can a company use business litigation to strategically protect itself from disputes? These are questions you might want to explore with an experienced business litigation lawyer in Pittsburgh . Business Litigation Strategies Are Often Preventive in Nature Many business litigation strategies are preventative in nature. In other words, companies take effective, early legal steps to eliminate the chances of disputes and legal action at a later date. One example of this is an effective business contract. When drafted properly, a business contract leaves little room for litigation or any other disputes. Many contracts contain arbitration or mediation clauses. These clauses force parties toward private negotiations instead of the courtroom floor. This private “alternative dispute resolution” (ADR) process is inherently cheaper, faster, and more private than litigation. Once a dispute reaches the courtroom, companies must pay much higher legal fees. They also face longer timelines. One of the biggest downsides of litigation for companies is its public nature. Many companies desperately need to keep sensitive information out of the public eye, whether that includes baseless allegations, copyrighted material, trade secrets, or more. Private negotiations can be so quick that they can hardly be called “disputes,” and issues may be resolved in a matter of weeks. In an ideal world, these disputes never even happen in the first place. A strong contract lays out clear responsibilities and privileges for each party, leaving little room for misinterpretation. Another obvious way to avoid business litigation is by choosing appropriate business partners. Another preventative business litigation strategy involves liability waivers. Although these waivers are not as effective as some company leaders assume, they can nonetheless prevent many needless or frivolous lawsuits. Liability waivers are not appropriate or possible in all industries, but they could be worth considering for businesses that welcome large numbers of patrons onto their premises. Business Litigation Strategies May Involve Regulatory Compliance Sometimes, the biggest legal threat to a business is not a partner or a customer, but rather the government. Regulatory compliance is an incredibly important business litigation strategy, and company leaders should consider consulting with lawyers who understand the specific regulations and laws that pertain to their industries. For example, a company that deals with industrial waste or chemicals may need to become highly familiar with the environmental laws. Generally speaking, these laws become more restrictive each year. Company leaders may need to keep a close eye on regulatory changes to ensure compliance. A company in another industry might deal with a substantial number of employees. If this is the case, the company might need to pay close attention to labor laws, discrimination laws, religious rights, and many other factors that can lead to employment lawsuits. Poaching is another issue that could be concerning, as are non-compete clauses. An experienced business litigation law firm may be able to help companies draft policies and contracts that drastically limit the number of employment-based legal issues in the future. For example, a company might have to follow strict guidelines if it wants to create enforceable non-compete clauses in Pennsylvania. Organized Corporate Governance Can Reduce Litigation and Disputes Many business disputes stem from poor, disorganized corporate governance. When the working relationship between shareholders, partners, and the executive suite begins to fall apart, disputes are inevitable. Effective shareholder agreements and organized record-keeping can go a long way in making sure everyone is on the same page. Business Litigation Attorneys Can Help With Risk Assessment Sometimes, dispute prevention starts with risk assessment. If company leaders become aware of a potential legal risk, they might consider a different approach or business strategy. For example, a company might consider entering into a new contract with a supplier. A business litigation attorney may be able to conduct effective legal research into the new supplier to determine the legal risk associated with a new contract. Perhaps the new supplier tends to get into lawsuits with its partners. Maybe the company is already in the process of being sued. Whatever the case may be, an experienced lawyer can help company leaders assess the legal risks associated with certain actions before moving forward. Most Disputes Never Reach the Trial Stage Since parties usually understand the downsides of going to trial, they tend to settle their disputes outside of court. This means that disputes rarely escalate into trials. However, this does not necessarily mean that a privately settled dispute is not costly for a company. Instead, a settlement could be disastrous for a company. This is why it makes sense to negotiate effectively, even if you’re dealing with someone who agrees to mediation or arbitration. Business litigation attorneys are often effective negotiators, and they can guide both parties toward mutually beneficial outcomes. If the goal is to reduce the cost of a dispute, a lawyer can push back with effective counterpoints and counteroffers. If the goal is to gain as large a settlement as possible, your lawyer can advocate on your behalf and reject lowball offers. Can a Business Litigation Lawyer in Pittsburgh Help My Company? Whether you are facing a dispute or you simply want to avoid the possibility of legal action in the future, a business litigation lawyer in Pittsburgh may be able to help. These lawyers can help your company take preventative steps, such as creating effective contracts or liability waivers. A business litigation attorney can also help you if your company is already facing a serious dispute or lawsuit. Consider reaching out to Cozza Law Group, PLLC, at (412) 790-2789 to learn more about your next potential steps. You can also find us online .

Why Smart Business Owners Schedule Quarterly Reviews with Their Lawyer 

do i have an employee or independent contractor?

Understand the litigation process step by step, including filing a complaint, discovery, trial, and appeals. A clear guide for first-time clients.

A FEderal Judge Changed the ai landscape

Why annual contract reviews matter for growing businesses. Learn the key contract clauses to review each year to reduce risk and avoid costly disputes.