Rocco Cozza • September 30, 2026

BUSINESS OWNERSHIP AND RISK REVIEW

business review

Understand what needs attention before your next major business decision.


Your company may have added owners, hired employees, changed its services, or signed larger contracts since its original documents were prepared. Before you make the next move, take a focused look at how those documents fit the business you operate today.


The Business Ownership and Risk Review is a defined legal project for established business owners who want help identifying priorities in their ownership arrangements, selected contracts, and business continuity planning. You receive a written report and a meeting with counsel to work through the findings.


Who the review is for


This review may be a useful starting point if you are considering a new partner, preparing for growth, thinking about a future ownership transition, or trying to understand which legal documents deserve attention first. It is also designed for owners whose business has changed since their agreements were last reviewed.


What your review includes


An opening conversation. A 30-minute meeting to understand the business, your ownership structure, your immediate concerns, and the decision or change you are considering.


A defined document review. Review of up to five existing documents, totaling up to 75 pages, for one business entity. We agree on the documents and legal questions before work begins so the review stays focused on your priorities.


A written priorities report. A plain language explanation of the issues identified in the agreed scope, questions that need more information, and recommended next steps. Each recommendation will explain why it matters and whether it should be addressed promptly, planned for the next 90 days, or revisited when a specific event occurs.


A strategy meeting. A 60-minute meeting to explain the report, answer questions about the findings, and discuss the order in which to address the recommendations. Where appropriate, we identify questions for your accountant, insurance professional, or another adviser.


An implementation proposal. If you want Cozza Law Group to carry out recommended legal work, we provide a separate proposed scope and fee. You decide whether to proceed.


What we can examine


We select the review areas around the documents available and your goals. These may include ownership and voting provisions, a partner departure or buyout process, selected customer or vendor contracts, an employment or contractor agreement, and the relationship between business ownership documents and intended succession plans.


Examples of documents include an operating or shareholder agreement, a buyout agreement, a key commercial contract, a commercial lease, or an employment agreement. The five-document limit means this is a targeted review. The engagement identifies the specific areas covered and the client represented.


How the process works


Start with a consultation to discuss fit. After conflict clearance, we confirm the project scope, fixed fee, delivery date, and engagement terms in writing. Once the engagement is in place, we collect the agreed documents through the firm’s designated submission process and conduct the opening meeting.


We then review the materials and prepare the report. At the strategy meeting, we discuss the findings and the work you may want to authorize next. Any additional documents, entities, or legal questions require an agreed adjustment to the scope and fee before that work begins.


Fee and timing


We offer the review for a fixed project fee quoted after the initial scope discussion and confirmed before engagement. The delivery date is agreed after considering the documents, complexity, and available capacity. If you have a transaction deadline, tell us during the first conversation.


Work outside this review


Document drafting or amendments, negotiations, filings, litigation, tax advice, valuations, and the preparation of estate planning documents require separate engagements. This review also does not include a comprehensive compliance audit or full acquisition due diligence. It cannot establish that every legal risk has been identified.


Tell us immediately about an active dispute, notice, or deadline so we can discuss the appropriate engagement. The review is designed for planning and prioritization; urgent matters require their own assessment.


Request your consultation


Tell us what has changed in your business and what decision is coming next. We will discuss whether the Business Ownership and Risk Review is an appropriate starting point and what a useful scope would look like.


Request a Business Ownership and Risk Review consultation


Cozza Law Group Business Law Blog

By Rocco Cozza • September 21, 2026
Why Growing Businesses Need a Coordinated Legal Team 
By Rocco Cozza • August 22, 2026
The enforceability of restrictive covenants and non-compete agreements depends on various factors, including how and when the employee/contractor initially signed the document. A company or employer may find it easier to enforce these agreements if they work with business law attorneys in Pittsburgh during the initial drafting and signing processes. If a company can steer clear of common mistakes from the very beginning, it can protect its competitiveness and avoid issues caused by former employees/contractors. Pennsylvania Only Enforces Non-Compete Agreements That Meet Five Requirements While Pennsylvania does not have a clear statute governing non-compete agreements, past cases have established a three-part test for their enforceability. First, a non-compete agreement must clearly define a timeframe in order to be enforceable. In other words, it must have an expiry date. You cannot stop an employee or contractor from competing indefinitely. Case law also suggests that non-compete agreements with the strongest enforceability are only valid for a few years (and not decades). A Pennsylvania court is also likely to reject a non-compete agreement with an ill-defined scope. In other words, the contract must describe exactly what the employee or contractor is prohibited from doing. The scope must also be reasonable, meaning you can only prevent employees from joining clear competitors. If a company is only distantly related to your industry or field, a non-compete probably can’t prevent your former employee from joining that organization. Scope also encompasses the type of company information that the employee uses to compete in the future. You cannot stop a former employee from using their own inherent skills and knowledge to set up a competing business. The only way you can legitimately curb competition from a former employee is by limiting the way they use your company’s “confidential information.” You might be surprised to learn that your former employees have every right to use company information that you consider to be confidential. As long as that information is publicly available, your employees can use it freely. This includes price lists, your suppliers' contact information, and general business practices well-known in your industry. One example of “confidential information” in this context is a list of your customers, complete with their email addresses and telephone numbers. Although this information might be publicly available, a normal person would not be able to recreate the finished list without spending years building a business (as you have). Intellectual property is another example of protected, confidential business information. If you have gone through the trouble of obtaining a patent or a copyright, your employee has no right to steal this information and use it to set up a competing business. The same logic applies to “trade secrets,” which may include confidential formulas or recipes. That said, it is important to remember that these violations are governed by intellectual property law, and not necessarily non-compete agreements. Non-compete agreements in Pennsylvania must also clearly define their geographical “reach.” You can only prevent an employee from competing with you in your geographical area, such as the City of Pittsburgh or Allegheny County. Even if your employee signs a non-compete agreement, they could theoretically travel to another state or country before starting a competing business. Finally, companies in Pennsylvania generally need to offer employees or contractors something in return for signing non-compete agreements. If the penalties for violating the agreement represent the “stick,” then the reward represents the “carrot.” In business law, this reward is called “consideration.” A common type of consideration is a job offer. With the job offer on the table, there is a clear reward for signing the non-compete agreement. On the other hand, the potential employee could always walk away from the job offer without excessive penalties. Another type of consideration is career advancement. This might be a raise or a promotion. An employee may decide to sign a non-compete agreement in order to access these career benefits. If they reject the offer, they would presumably keep their current position in the company without any other consequences. Pennsylvania courts may deem unenforceable a non-compete agreement that lacks these promised rewards. In the eyes of the court, an employee faces a difficult situation if they could lose their job by not signing a non-compete agreement. As with all contracts, duress or undue influence can make non-compete agreements unenforceable. Penalties Help Enforce Valid Non-Compete Agreements Assuming a non-compete agreement is valid, what exactly stops an employee from violating it? Without effective penalties, a non-compete agreement is useless. You can enforce your non-compete agreements with “injunctions.” These are court orders that require your former employee or contractor to immediately stop working for the competing business. If they have set up their own business, a court order could force them to shut down operations. Penalties may also include damages. The court can order the competing employee or contractor to pay compensation for your losses. For example, an employee might have stolen all of your customers by offering the same services for a lower price. In this situation, you could recover all of the profit you would have earned if those customers had remained loyal. Negotiation Is Often the First Step of Enforcement While taking your former employee or contractor to court can lead to positive results, most parties attempt to resolve their disputes through negotiation first. Indeed, mandatory “arbitration clauses” are often built into non-compete agreements. A business law attorney can represent your best interests during these negotiations, ensuring positive outcomes without an expensive, time-consuming trial. Can a Business Law Attorney in Pittsburgh Help Me? A b usiness law attorney in Pittsburgh may be able to help if you are serious about making your restrictive covenants and non-compete agreements as enforceable as possible. Legal assistance with drafting and negotiating these agreements from the outset may improve their enforceability if a dispute arises later. That said, lawyers can also help resolve disputes over restrictive covenants signed long in the past. To explore this topic further, consider contacting Cozza Law Group, PLLC at (412) 790-2789. You can also find us online .