Benjamin Webb • January 11, 2022

If your workers receive tips, keep reading...

Restaurant owners are constantly faced with new challenges when it comes to complying with state, local, and federal regulations. Recently, the Department of Labor changed the requirements relating to minimum wage and compensation for tipped workers. Compliance with the new federal requirements for tipped workers is important as each violation may result in a $1,162 penalty.


Currently in Pennsylvania, a business owner must pay all their employees at least the minimum wage of $7.25. But businesses that employ “tipped-workers” are only required to pay those workers $2.83 directly. The remaining $4.42 may be collected by the worker as tips, and the employer can take credit for that amount to show compliance with minimum wage standards. Under the new Final Rule, an employer can only take a tip credit for work that was either tip producing or work that directly supports tip-producing work.


What is a Tip?


Whatever amount the customer leaves over and above their bill (plus tax) is considered a tip. Some restaurants tack on a mandatory service charge on bills for large tables, private parties, or catered events. Mandatory service charges are not considered a tip, and employers may keep this amount. For tax purposes, any amount paid out from the mandatory service charge to employees is considered a wage and not a tip.

 

What is Tip Producing Work?


The distinction between tip-producing work and non-tip-producing work is simple. Tip-producing work is defined by the DOL as “all aspects of the work performed by a tipped employee when they are providing service to customers” from which they are receiving tips. To illustrate, tip-producing work for a bartender might include, recommending/making drinks, conversing with patrons, and changing the channel on the bar TVs. Conversely, non-tipped work might include cleaning bathrooms, sweeping the parking lot, or painting. An employer may take a tip credit for any time sent spent on tip-producing work.


In certain circumstances, an employer may also take a tip credit for time an employee spends completing work that directly supports tip-producing work. This is work that is performed in preparation for tip-producing work. Again, using a bartender as an example, directly supporting work might include wiping down the bar, cutting fruit before customers arrive, and filling drink dispensers. An employer may only take a tip credit for directly supporting work where 1) the work does not constitute more than 20 percent of that employee’s hours worked during the workweek, or 2) the work does not exceed thirty consecutive minutes of the worker’s time.


How does Tip Pooling Work?


Employers may require tipped employees to pay their tips into a “tip pool” that is shared among the tipped workers. But, if the employer is claiming a tip credit to comply with minimum wage requirements, then only employees who regularly receive tips can be part of the tip pool. That means that under Pennsylvania law, employees cannot be required to share tips with other employees who do not typically receive tips, such as dishwashers or cooks (unless the employer does not claim a tip credit and pays each employee the minimum wage directly).


Likewise, managers and supervisors are prohibited from receiving tips that have been paid into a tip pool (even if they are required to contribute to that tip pool). Managers or supervisors are only permitted to retain a tip when they receive the tip directly from customers based on the service provided directly and solely by the manager/supervisor.

 

If you have questions regarding your company’s tipping procedures click this link or call and schedule a consultation with Cozza Law Group PLLC today!



Cozza Law Group Business Law Blog

By Matthew Bolewitz April 20, 2026
the 5 d's of business - a must read for business owners
By Rocco Cozza April 19, 2026
How Business Litigation Protects Companies From Costly Disputes Although there are many costs involved in doing business, disputes can take a particularly high toll on a company's finances. These disputes might involve contract breaches, copyright violations, premises liability lawsuits, allegations of fraud, and much more. The obvious strategy is to avoid these disputes at all costs. How does business litigation fit into this equation? Can a company use business litigation to strategically protect itself from disputes? These are questions you might want to explore with an experienced business litigation lawyer in Pittsburgh . Business Litigation Strategies Are Often Preventive in Nature Many business litigation strategies are preventative in nature. In other words, companies take effective, early legal steps to eliminate the chances of disputes and legal action at a later date. One example of this is an effective business contract. When drafted properly, a business contract leaves little room for litigation or any other disputes. Many contracts contain arbitration or mediation clauses. These clauses force parties toward private negotiations instead of the courtroom floor. This private “alternative dispute resolution” (ADR) process is inherently cheaper, faster, and more private than litigation. Once a dispute reaches the courtroom, companies must pay much higher legal fees. They also face longer timelines. One of the biggest downsides of litigation for companies is its public nature. Many companies desperately need to keep sensitive information out of the public eye, whether that includes baseless allegations, copyrighted material, trade secrets, or more. Private negotiations can be so quick that they can hardly be called “disputes,” and issues may be resolved in a matter of weeks. In an ideal world, these disputes never even happen in the first place. A strong contract lays out clear responsibilities and privileges for each party, leaving little room for misinterpretation. Another obvious way to avoid business litigation is by choosing appropriate business partners. Another preventative business litigation strategy involves liability waivers. Although these waivers are not as effective as some company leaders assume, they can nonetheless prevent many needless or frivolous lawsuits. Liability waivers are not appropriate or possible in all industries, but they could be worth considering for businesses that welcome large numbers of patrons onto their premises. Business Litigation Strategies May Involve Regulatory Compliance Sometimes, the biggest legal threat to a business is not a partner or a customer, but rather the government. Regulatory compliance is an incredibly important business litigation strategy, and company leaders should consider consulting with lawyers who understand the specific regulations and laws that pertain to their industries. For example, a company that deals with industrial waste or chemicals may need to become highly familiar with the environmental laws. Generally speaking, these laws become more restrictive each year. Company leaders may need to keep a close eye on regulatory changes to ensure compliance. A company in another industry might deal with a substantial number of employees. If this is the case, the company might need to pay close attention to labor laws, discrimination laws, religious rights, and many other factors that can lead to employment lawsuits. Poaching is another issue that could be concerning, as are non-compete clauses. An experienced business litigation law firm may be able to help companies draft policies and contracts that drastically limit the number of employment-based legal issues in the future. For example, a company might have to follow strict guidelines if it wants to create enforceable non-compete clauses in Pennsylvania. Organized Corporate Governance Can Reduce Litigation and Disputes Many business disputes stem from poor, disorganized corporate governance. When the working relationship between shareholders, partners, and the executive suite begins to fall apart, disputes are inevitable. Effective shareholder agreements and organized record-keeping can go a long way in making sure everyone is on the same page. Business Litigation Attorneys Can Help With Risk Assessment Sometimes, dispute prevention starts with risk assessment. If company leaders become aware of a potential legal risk, they might consider a different approach or business strategy. For example, a company might consider entering into a new contract with a supplier. A business litigation attorney may be able to conduct effective legal research into the new supplier to determine the legal risk associated with a new contract. Perhaps the new supplier tends to get into lawsuits with its partners. Maybe the company is already in the process of being sued. Whatever the case may be, an experienced lawyer can help company leaders assess the legal risks associated with certain actions before moving forward. Most Disputes Never Reach the Trial Stage Since parties usually understand the downsides of going to trial, they tend to settle their disputes outside of court. This means that disputes rarely escalate into trials. However, this does not necessarily mean that a privately settled dispute is not costly for a company. Instead, a settlement could be disastrous for a company. This is why it makes sense to negotiate effectively, even if you’re dealing with someone who agrees to mediation or arbitration. Business litigation attorneys are often effective negotiators, and they can guide both parties toward mutually beneficial outcomes. If the goal is to reduce the cost of a dispute, a lawyer can push back with effective counterpoints and counteroffers. If the goal is to gain as large a settlement as possible, your lawyer can advocate on your behalf and reject lowball offers. Can a Business Litigation Lawyer in Pittsburgh Help My Company? Whether you are facing a dispute or you simply want to avoid the possibility of legal action in the future, a business litigation lawyer in Pittsburgh may be able to help. These lawyers can help your company take preventative steps, such as creating effective contracts or liability waivers. A business litigation attorney can also help you if your company is already facing a serious dispute or lawsuit. Consider reaching out to Cozza Law Group, PLLC, at (412) 790-2789 to learn more about your next potential steps. You can also find us online .