Matthew Bolewitz • March 16, 2022

Make sure you have your ducks in a row!

Business Alerts: It’s Almost Internship Season



It is that time of year where businesses start to make plans and define their goals for the Spring and Summer months. A common question for our law firm is whether a business should hire an intern – and more specifically, does the business need to pay that intern. 


Our firm understands that when the economy is down or highly unpredictable, businesses will want to find ways to cut expenses – which may include exploring an unpaid internship program. It is a common misconception that determining whether to pay interns is in the sole discretion of the business owner. Instead, businesses must comply with the U.S. Department of Labor and federal standards regarding internships. Failure to do sure may result in potential liability and penalties for unpaid wages as well as liability for unpaid employment-related taxes for misclassifying an intern and not paying them wages.  Therefore, business owners should proceed with extreme caution.


The Test: Should an Intern be Paid?


Although every jurisdiction will vary in its analysis; however, a strong baseline for any business when considering an internship program is to review and consider the “Glatt Test.” In 2018, the U.S. Department of Labor endorsed a non-exhaustive seven-factor test to analyze whether an intern is entitled to compensation. These factors include:


1.    Do the intern and the employer clearly understand that there is no expectation of compensation?  Any promise of compensation, express or implied, suggests that the intern is an employee—and vice versa.


2.    Is the training in the internship program similar to that which would be given in an educational environment?


3.    Is the internship tied to the intern's formal education program by integrated coursework or the receipt of academic credit?


4.    Does the internship program accommodate the intern's academic commitments by corresponding to the academic calendar?


5.    Is the internship limited to the period in which the internship provides the intern with beneficial learning?


6.    Does the intern's work complement, rather than displace, the work of paid employees while providing significant educational benefits to the intern?


7.    Do the intern and the employer understand that the internship is conducted without entitlement to a paid job at the conclusion of the internship.


Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc., 791 F.3d 376, 384 (2d Cir. 2015).

It is important to remember that this decision requires a balance of all the circumstances. No single factor will be dispositive to conclude whether an intern should be paid – therefore, every factor should be taken into consideration. For example, factor #2 requires businesses to think about the educational value that their internship provides. Is such position commensurate with the training that the intern would receive at their educational institution? If not, then such an internship would weigh towards a paid position. Factor #6 requires businesses to assess whether an intern’s duties is designed to replace the work performed by paid employees, thereby allowing the business to reduce the number of employees needed. If so, that would again lean towards a paid position.


After review of the seven-factor test, if a business decides that their internship would qualify for an unpaid position, the business should enter into a written agreement signed by both the business and the unpaid intern. Such an agreement would reinforce the legal requirements above and clarify the general expectations for the position. 


For assistance or more information, please contact Matthew Bolewitz, Senior Counsel at Cozza Law Group at (724) 858-8742 or mbolewitz@cozzalaw.com.



Cozza Law Group Business Law Blog

Understanding Shareholder Disputes and How They are Resolved

By Rocco Cozza • June 8, 2026
Shareholders set corporations apart from other types of businesses, and they often help companies achieve considerable levels of success. On the other hand, executives and directors often forget that each shareholder is a part owner. With so many owners, it is easy to see how complex shareholder disputes can become. The first step is to understand why and how these shareholder disputes arise. The second step is to resolve the dispute, potentially with guidance from an experienced business litigation attorney in Pennsylvania . Shareholder Disputes Arise Because of Shareholder Rights To understand shareholder disputes, you first have to understand shareholder rights. Common shareholders have voting privileges, which means they can control the trajectory of the company. Although some shareholders never bother to vote, others take these rights very seriously. The more shares you have, the more power you have to control major decisions. Shareholders also have the right to profit from the success of a company. Because of this, they have a financial incentive to oversee the company’s trajectory. If the company leadership starts to make mistakes or intentionally act against the interests of the shareholders, disputes naturally arise. Finally, shareholders rely on the accuracy of records and corporate books to make their investment decisions. For example, they might choose to sell or hold their stocks depending on the published earnings of a company. If these records are inaccurate or intentionally altered, the shareholders may make poor investment choices as a result. Now that you understand shareholder rights, it is easy to see how shareholder disputes might arise. Shareholders might sue if they feel that the company is making major decisions without bothering to hold votes. They might also sue if they feel that the leadership is acting against their best interests. Another type of lawsuit might involve shareholders suing a company for inflating their earnings and releasing inaccurate data. Shareholder Disputes Often Begin With Alternative Dispute Resolution Most lawsuits, including shareholder disputes, go through a process of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) before parties actually proceed to the courtroom. ADR may involve mediation or arbitration, and it takes the form of private negotiations. The shareholders may select legal counsel to negotiate on their behalf, as it would be impractical for thousands of individuals to sit at the negotiation table. In other situations, an individual shareholder might file a lawsuit on their own. In this situation, that individual might be present at the negotiation table alongside their legal counsel. ADR often serves everyone’s best interests, helping to resolve disputes without resorting to expensive and time-consuming litigation. Public trials are not good for business, and shareholders might be just as willing to resolve these issues in private as the executive suite. Arbitration clauses are often “built in” to the corporate bylaws or charter. In other words, parties may have no choice but to attempt mediation/arbitration before proceeding to a trial. That said, parties are under no obligation to successfully complete the arbitration process. One party could refuse to negotiate, and a trial would subsequently become inevitable. What are Some Common Types of Shareholder Disputes? Shareholder disputes may take various forms. All of these lawsuits fall into four main categories, however. An individual shareholder might file a direct lawsuit against the company. Another type of lawsuit might be a “derivative suit,” which involves the shareholders suing on behalf of the corporation. This type of lawsuit often targets a specific bad actor within the company, such as a self-dealing CEO. Class actions are also relatively common. In this type of lawsuit, numerous shareholders join forces to file a single lawsuit against the corporation, often under federal securities law. Finally, a dispute might take the form of an “appraisal proceeding,” which focuses on whether the company has received a fair valuation before a merger. How Does Pennsylvania Law Affect Shareholder Disputes? Pennsylvania law is quite deferential to the board of directors, granting it considerable control and authority. A common source of conflict in a corporation is the contrast between the “democracy” of the shareholders and the authority of the board of directors. Pennsylvania tilts the scales in favor of the board. First, Pennsylvania requires a shareholder to make a written demand to the board before they can file a derivative lawsuit. The board can then appoint a “Special Litigation Committee” to investigate the shareholders' claims and demands. If the committee determines that a lawsuit would go against the best interests of the company, courts in Pennsylvania may not allow it to continue. It is difficult to circumvent these requirements for derivative lawsuits in the Keystone State because of strict limits on direct lawsuits. Finally, Pennsylvania has no rule that states a board must place its shareholders’ interests above those of other relevant parties. These parties might include employees, customers, suppliers, and even the greater community or environment. This is not the same in other jurisdictions, making the Keystone State a “board-friendly” state that repels takeovers. In fact, it is considered by many to be the most management-friendly state in the country and one of the toughest places for shareholder plaintiffs to sue. While this is good news for boards facing shareholder lawsuits, the Keystone State’s protections are not infinite. Effective legal representation is necessary to take advantage of the jurisdiction’s legal safeguards. On the other hand, plaintiff shareholders can still achieve success in Pennsylvania, but they may need to rely on innovative, experienced business litigation lawyers in the face of strong regulatory barriers. Contact Cozza Law Group PLLC to Learn More About Shareholder Disputes While online research can provide plenty of insights into shareholder disputes, each case is slightly different. Given the varied nature of shareholder disputes, it may help to discuss your specific circumstances with a business litigation attorney in Pennsylvania . Cozza Law Group PLLC serves enterprises of all sizes, offering a fractional counsel model that provides legal guidance that fits your company’s unique needs. Continue this dialogue by contacting us at 412-453-8673 or visiting us online .

What to Do When a Business Partner Breaches a Contract

By Rocco Cozza • May 10, 2026
Business owners in Pennsylvania depend on clear contracts to formalize relationships and enforce obligations. When a business partner breaches a contract, the next steps may seem unclear. Perhaps you assumed that with a clear contract in place, your partner would never dare violate it. So what happens now? What kinds of penalties might your business partner face? Will you both have to go to court? How can you limit the cost of this contractual dispute and maintain your profit margins? These are all questions worth raising during a consultation with a contract lawyer in Pittsburgh . Review Your Contract to Determine the Next Steps The fact that you already have a contract in place is encouraging. This means that at the very least, your business partner will face certain consequences for breaching the contract. That said, the nature of these consequences depends entirely on your unique contract, and some are less effective than others in holding parties accountable for breaches. Perhaps the most obvious step is to confirm whether your contract has an arbitration or mediation clause. If a clause of this nature exists, you must go through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) before proceeding to a trial. If you are not familiar with the ADR process, you should know that resolving a dispute in private is generally preferable to litigation (trials). From a business perspective, private negotiations cost less. They are also faster, allowing everyone to focus fully on running their respective businesses sooner rather than later. Finally, the confidential nature of these discussions may help protect trade secrets, intellectual property, and other details that could be embarrassing or harmful for businesses. Many people feel that ADR is less stressful than trials. You should also check your existing contract for clauses that outline penalties for breaches. These penalties are often financial in nature, and they can dissuade business partners from violating their contracts. Sometimes, simply reminding business partners of these financial penalties is enough to encourage them to adhere to their contractual obligations. You can discuss potential penalties and outcomes with your business partner without involving a lawyer. This is often referred to as “informal resolution,” and it occurs before the ADR process begins. That being said, you may want to inform your lawyer of any plans you might have for resolving the dispute. If you are not careful, you could violate laws and regulations while negotiating in an informal manner. For example, you could inadvertently violate laws against extortion as you attempt to pressure your business partner into fulfilling the contractual obligation. Pennsylvania also has specific debt collection laws that prevent you from contacting debtors in certain ways or at certain times. Evidence Is Important During a Contract Breach Although you may not need to go to court to resolve the contract breach, it makes sense to begin collecting evidence as soon as possible. You should also be aware that your business partner is probably collecting evidence of their own at the same time. Be extremely careful about how you communicate with your business partner during this time, especially in emails, letters, and text messages. All of these written communications could become relevant in a later trial. Assume that your business partner is taking screenshots of your texts, saving your emails, and making copies of everything. If you’re concerned about saying something that could be problematic during a later trial, consider allowing your business litigation attorney to communicate on your behalf. The type of evidence necessary for a breach of contract lawsuit depends on the type of breach involved. If the breach involves a business partner, you may be facing issues like misappropriated funds, confidentiality breaches, leadership disputes, and failures to contribute equally to the business. In the event of misappropriated funds, financial records may be particularly important. If possible, make copies of bank statements and all other relevant financial documents as soon as you notice the misappropriation. If your business partner refuses to provide certain financial documents to you, rest assured that your lawyer can help you gain access through a pre-trial process called “discovery.” The court can compel your business partner to hand over the documents if they refuse to comply. If you are dealing with a confidentiality breach, you can also gain access to key communications through the discovery process. For example, your business partner might have shared trade secrets or intellectual property with an unauthorized third party through email. You can compel your business partner to hand over these emails, giving you the evidence you need to prove the breach. Perhaps your business partner started making important decisions about the business without your input. Maybe you feel sidelined, and you believe that your business partner is trying to take over the business while forcing you out. In this situation, you need to find evidence that your business partner started making key decisions without your input. If a majority vote was necessary, find evidence that this voting process never occurred. If you believe that your business partner is not doing their fair share of work, you should compile evidence that shows you are doing most or all of the “heavy lifting” when it comes to daily operations. Perhaps you believe that your business partner is profiting from your hard work while doing almost nothing to help the business grow. If your contract states that all partners should make a good-faith effort to contribute, this could constitute a legitimate contract breach. Can a Business Contract Lawyer in Pittsburgh Help Me? A business contract lawyer in Pittsburgh may be able to help if your partner recently breached your contract. While online research may help you understand what happens next, each contract is unique. Because of the varying nature of these contracts, it makes sense to discuss your specific circumstances with a legal professional. Cozza Law Group PLLC has consistently earned mentions in lists like “Pennsylvania Super Lawyers” and “Law Firm 500.” Our attorneys have experience in many different industries, and we have helped companies handle numerous contractual disputes. Contact Cozza Law Group PLLC at 412-453-8673 today to get started. You can also find us online .